A quick blog entry to say that yes:

And I will even do my Extension's talk which had a success at pgday.eu. The
talk will be updated to include the last developments of the extension's
feature, as some of it changed already in between, and to detail the plan
for the ALTER EXTENSION ... UPGRADE feature that I'd like to see included as
soon as 9.1, but time is running so fast.
In fact the design for the UPGRADE has been done and reviewed already, but
there's yet to reach consensus on how to setup which is the upgrade file to
use when upgrading from a given version to another. I've solved it in my
patch, of course, by adding properties into the extension's control
file. That's the best place to have that setup I think, it allows lots of
flexibility, leave the extension's author in charge, and avoids any hard
coding of any kind of assumptions about file naming or whatever.
Next days and reviews will tell us more about how the design is received.
Meanwhile, we're working on finalizing the main extension's patch, offering
pg_dump support.
See you at FOSDEM!
Tags
PostgreSQL Conferences Extensions FOSDEM 9.1
Previous Articles
- pg_basebackup Sunday, November 07 2010, 13:45
- Dynamic Triggers in PLpgSQL Wednesday, November 24 2010, 16:45
- el-get 1.1, with 174 recipes Monday, December 20 2010, 16:45
- Starting afresh with el-get Tuesday, January 11 2011, 16:20
Next Articles
- Back from FOSDEM Monday, February 07 2011, 11:10
- desktop-mode and readahead Wednesday, February 23 2011, 16:45
- Extensions in 9.1 Tuesday, March 01 2011, 16:30
- towards pg_staging 1.0 Tuesday, March 29 2011, 15:30

